Free LBO Model Template: Blank Test and Answer Key (Excel)
Most free LBO model templates are already built. You open the file, the formulas are in place, and you learn almost nothing. This one is deliberately the opposite. It is a blank LBO model test with labeled rows and no formulas, plus a completed answer key so you can check yourself line by line.
The prompt is a full five-year LBO with a term loan, mezzanine debt with PIK interest, a cash sweep, purchase accounting and a working capital build. It is close to what a real PE modeling test looks like, and it is designed to be finished in about an hour.
Download the LBO Model Template
Free, no email required. The workbook has three tabs: Instructions, a blank Template, and a completed Answer Key.
Excel Template + Answer Key (.xlsx) One-Page Prompt (PDF)What Is in the Workbook
The prompt and every assumption in one place, plus what you are expected to hand in.
The blank model. Every row is labeled and laid out in the right order, from sources and uses through to returns, but the formulas are stripped out. This is the tab you build on.
The same model fully built. Use it to check your work, or to unstick yourself if a section will not tie.
The PDF is the same prompt on one page, formatted so you can keep it open on a second screen or print it while you build.
The Prompt: Transaction Assumptions
A five-year hold, bought and sold at the same multiple, so the return has to come from EBITDA growth and debt paydown rather than multiple expansion.
| Assumption | Value |
|---|---|
| Entry EV / LTM EBITDA | 10.0x |
| Exit EV / LTM EBITDA | 10.0x |
| Hold period | 5 years |
| Transaction fees | $25m |
| Minimum cash | $20m |
| Management rollover | 8.0% of equity |
| Tax rate | 25.0% |
| Existing debt | Refinanced at close |
Financing Assumptions
Three tranches, with the mezzanine carrying both cash and PIK interest. The PIK accrues onto the balance rather than being paid in cash, which is the detail most candidates forget to add back on the cash flow statement.
| Assumption | Value |
|---|---|
| Revolver commitment | 0.5x LTM EBITDA, undrawn |
| Revolver interest / commitment fee | 7.0% / 0.50% on undrawn |
| Term loan | 4.0x LTM EBITDA |
| Term loan interest / amortization | 8.0% / 1.0% per year |
| Mezzanine | 1.5x LTM EBITDA |
| Mezzanine interest | 10.0% cash + 3.0% PIK |
| OID / financing fees | 2.0% each, 7-year amortization |
| Cash interest income | 2.0% |
| Cash sweep | 100%, revolver then term loan |
Purchase Accounting
| Assumption | Value |
|---|---|
| Excess allocated to PP&E | 20% |
| Incremental D&A life | 15 years |
Operating Assumptions
Revenue compounds at 8.0% while margins are held flat, so EBITDA growth is purely volume driven. That keeps the operating build simple and puts the difficulty in the debt schedule, which is where modeling tests are usually won or lost.
| Income statement | Value |
|---|---|
| LTM revenue | $800m |
| Revenue growth | 8.0% per year |
| COGS | 60.0% of revenue, held flat |
| LTM EBITDA | $120m (15.0% margin, held flat) |
| D&A | 3.0% of revenue |
| Opening balance sheet | Value |
|---|---|
| Cash | $30m |
| Accounts receivable | $100m |
| Inventory | $80m |
| PP&E | $500m |
| Goodwill | $150m |
| Accounts payable | $55m |
| Accrued liabilities | $40m |
| Existing debt | $300m |
| Shareholders equity | $465m |
| Working capital and cash flow | Value |
|---|---|
| Days sales outstanding | 45 |
| Inventory days (on COGS) | 60 |
| Days payable outstanding (on COGS) | 40 |
| Accrued liabilities | 5.0% of revenue |
| Capex | 3.5% of revenue |
How to Use the Template
Build on the Template tab and leave the Answer Key closed until you are done, or you will end up reading a model rather than building one. Work in this order:
- Sources and uses. Size the debt off LTM EBITDA, add the fees and minimum cash, and let the sponsor equity fall out as the plug.
- Income statement. Grow revenue, hold the margins, and remember the incremental D&A created by the PP&E step-up.
- Working capital. Convert the days assumptions into balances, then take the change as a cash item.
- Cash flow. Add back D&A, the OID and fee amortization, and the mezzanine PIK, then subtract capex and the working capital build.
- Debt schedule. Mandatory amortization first, then the sweep. The mezzanine balance grows by the PIK each year.
- Returns. Exit EBITDA times the exit multiple, less net debt, divided by the entry equity.
If a section will not tie, get a balancing shell working before you layer in the sweep, the PIK and the purchase accounting. A simpler model that ties scores better than a fuller one that breaks.
One deliberate simplification
Interest is calculated on beginning balances, not average balances. Production models use average balances, which makes the model circular, because interest depends on the debt balance and the balance depends on cash flow after interest. That requires iterative calculation to be switched on in Excel. Beginning balances keep this version clean, and knowing why the alternative is circular is a common follow-up question in interviews.
Check Your Answer
If your model is built correctly, the returns land here:
| Output | Answer |
|---|---|
| Entry equity check (sponsor plus rollover) | $611m |
| Exit EBITDA (year 5) | $176m |
| Exit enterprise value | $1,763m |
| Exit equity value | $1,311m |
| MOIC | 2.14x |
| IRR | 16.5% |
Small differences are normal and usually come from rounding or from how you treated the fees. If you are more than a few tenths of a turn away on MOIC, the problem is almost always in the debt schedule: either the sweep is paying down more than the cash available, or the PIK is not accruing onto the mezzanine balance.
Why This Kind of Practice Works
Candidates who have built ten LBOs walk into a modeling test with the structure as muscle memory, which frees up their attention for the details specific to that prompt. Candidates who have built one or two spend half the clock deciding where the debt schedule goes. The gap is reps, not talent.
Build this one from the blank tab, then rebuild it a week later without looking. The second attempt is where the structure actually sticks. When you can complete it inside an hour with the returns tying, you are in reasonable shape for most case studies and modeling tests you will be handed.
Related Guides
- PE Modeling Test: How to Pass the 90-Minute and 3-Hour LBO
- How to Ace the Paper LBO: Step-by-Step Framework + Practice Problems
- What a Private Equity Case Study Looks Like (With 2 Free Examples)
- Top 50 PE Interview Questions (2026): With Model Answers
- Breaking Into PE from Investment Banking: The Complete Guide
- PE Recruiting Timeline 2026: When to Start Preparing
Practice More LBOs on Your Phone
PEPath includes 10 paper LBO practice prompts with full step-by-step solutions, 7 recruiting case studies, and 300+ interview questions covering modeling test concepts, accounting and deal mechanics.
Download PEPath Free